Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼öÁ¾ÀÇ Ä¡¼ö óġÁ¦°¡ À¯°ß À¯±¸Ä¡ÀÇ Ä¡¼öÁ¶Á÷¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ °üÇÑ Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀû ºñ±³ ¿¬±¸

A Histological Evaluation on the Effects of Several Pulpotomy Agents Applied to Pulp Tissue of Primary Molars in Dogs

´Ü±¹´ëÄ¡ÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò³í¹®Áý 1992³â 4±Ç 1È£ p.291 ~ 308
ÇÑÁ¤Çö, ÇÑ¿µ±Ù, Ãֽ±¸,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÇÑÁ¤Çö (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³
ÇÑ¿µ±Ù (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³
Ãֽ±¸ (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³

Abstract


Transcranial radiograph is widely used in the diagnosis of craniomandibular disorder because it can be used by the dentist with relative ease in spite of image distortion. But correct information can be obtained only when one know the image
change
by
projection angulation.
The author compared the condyle position in the 3 groups of transcranial radiographs(horizontal angulation-0¡Æ, 5¡Æ, individualized) with that in the individualized corrected lateral tomogram by objective and subjective evaluation methods.
@ES The results were as follows :
@EN 1. Among 3 transcranial groups, the condyle position in indivdualized group showed the highest concordance rate with that in the tomogram group in objective and subjective evaluation methods.
2. Correlation coefficient between individualized transcranial group and tomogram group in objective evaluation method was highest(P¡Â0.01).
3. Image clarity in individualized transcranial group was worse than that of the other two transcranial groups.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸